Home › Guides › Mifflin-St Jeor Calculator
Calculator + guide

Mifflin-St Jeor Calculator

Run your numbers below, then read exactly how the formula works.

Mifflin-St Jeor calculator

WHO guideline: 150 min/week minimum · 300 for full benefits.

Fill in the form and press Calculate — results appear here instantly. Nothing leaves your browser.

The formula

Published in 1990 by Mark Mifflin and Sachiko St Jeor, this equation replaced the older Harris-Benedict formula as the clinical standard, and the American Dietetic Association has endorsed it as the most reliable predictor for the general adult population.

Men: BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) − 5 × age (years) + 5

Women: BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) − 5 × age (years) − 161

Worked example

A 35-year-old woman, 165 cm, 68 kg: 10 × 68 + 6.25 × 165 − 5 × 35 − 161 = 680 + 1,031 − 175 − 161 = 1,375 kcal/day BMR. Multiply by an activity factor (say 1.55 for moderate activity) and her TDEE estimate is about 2,130 kcal.

The same numbers for a man add 166 kcal (the +5 versus −161 constant), reflecting average lean-mass differences at equal size.

Accuracy and limits

Validation studies put Mifflin-St Jeor within 10% of measured BMR for the largest share of people of any simple equation — but that still means a 1,500 kcal prediction could be 1,350 or 1,650 in reality.

It systematically misses for very muscular people (underestimates) and those with high body fat (overestimates), because it never sees body composition. If you know your body-fat percentage, Katch-McArdle handles those cases better.

Put it into practice: run your own numbers with the related calculator — free, instant, and nothing leaves your browser.

Frequently asked questions

Is Mifflin-St Jeor better than Harris-Benedict?

For most people, yes — head-to-head validation work consistently shows smaller average error, which is why clinical practice switched.

Does the equation work for athletes?

It tends to underestimate very lean, muscular athletes by 5–15%. Katch-McArdle with a measured body-fat percentage is the better tool there.

What activity factor should I use with it?

Most people overestimate. If you have a desk job and train 3–4 times a week, 1.4–1.55 is usually closer to truth than 1.725.

More guides

Written by Murugan Vellaichamy, Software Engineer · every formula on this site is cited — see our methodology · corrections welcome

Sources

  1. Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990. [link]
  2. Roza AM, Shizgal HM. The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984. [link]
Medical disclaimer: CaloriesKit provides educational estimates only and is not medical, nutritional, or fitness advice. Calculators use population-level formulas that may not reflect your individual needs. Consult a physician or registered dietitian before changing your diet or exercise routine, especially if you have a medical condition, are pregnant, or are under 18.